GPT's Possible Responses to Judge Newsom's Experiments in Snell v. United

In his concurrance in Snell v. United Ins. Co. (11th Cir. 2024), Judge Newsom asked ChatGPT: What is the ordinary meaning of "landscaping"? followed by: Is installing an in-ground trampoline considered "landscaping"? This visualization shows GPT-3.5's possible responses to Newsom's questions.

How to read this chart

Each box represents a segment of text GPT-3.5 could generate. The number on the left indicates the probability of GPT-3.5 selecting that text.

The colored bar shows the likelihood of GPT's responses to Newsom's follow-up question, given the response so far.

For example, there is a 41% probability of an answer starting with: The ordinary meaning of. After that, there is a 79% chance that GPT-3.5 will add the word "landscaping".

Instructions

- to expand an option: click on box
- to expand all visible options: press the + key.

This website is associated with (citation pending spring 2025 law review submission cycle). If you use or share this tool in your work, please cite that aritcle. Thanks.